It appears that you have not yet registered. Please register to gain Full access.    
B a d S c r e e n N a m e s


Go Back   BadScreenNames.com > Dating > Online Dating Websites
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-09-2009, 07:49 PM   #1
ironmom
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 53
Default Match.com Hit With Class Action Lawsuit

A New York man has filed a class action lawsuit against popular dating site Match.com, claiming that the site deceives subscribers by showing them photos and profiles of non-paying members who can't respond to romantic advances.

Match.com allows anyone to create a profile for free, but in order to read or respond to messages, or contact potential partners, customers must sign up for a subscription with the website.

Sean McGinn, of Brooklyn, NY, alleges that this practice caused him "humiliation and disappointment" when he tried to contact non-subscribing members and never heard back from them. McGinn apparently took this to mean that his efforts had failed, when in fact his romantic interests were unable to read, let alone reply to, his messages without subscribing or re-activating an expired account. (Match.com doesn't delete profiles of members who have canceled their accounts or let them expire, further defrauding bachelors like McGinn.)

According to McGinn, the user agreement he signed when he created his account never warned him that not every profile is that of a bona fide member. McGinn asserts that Match.com "defrauds the consumer of his/her time and personal investment every time a person pays Match's subscription fee and writes to a member who won’t have the ability to read what they wrote or see their profile."

McGinn, already uncomfortable with dating, has been further traumatized by his online experience. His suit says that "despite the emotional vulnerability inherent in the dating process, fraught as it is with fear of rejection and anxiety, Match defrauds the consumer of his/her time, labor, and emotional investment" by failing to inform them that non-subscribing members cannot reciprocate their sweet nothings.

Read more from the original article: http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...h_lawsuit.html
ironmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cyberbullying lawsuit dpachec Networks in the News 0 10-11-2008 01:19 AM
MySpcae lawsuit kanga1977 Networks in the News 0 12-12-2007 03:38 PM
Action Against Web Sites ImChris Networks in the News 0 12-06-2007 04:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.


©2007 BadScreenNames.com, All Rights Reserved